by Nichelle of Anovelista.com
Is the latest cover of The New Yorker ironic or destructive?

From Jake Tapper of ABC News:
An illustration by Barry Blitt depicts Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., and his wife Michelle in the Oval Office, revealing their “true” selves: Michelle is in full revolutionary garb, an enormous afro making her look like a millennial Angela Davis, holding an automatic weapon and wearing military pants.
In the cartoon Michelle is giving dap, or fist-bumping, with her husband who is wearing a turban and is dressed in garb perhaps more appropriate for a madrassa in Lahore than the Oval Office.
A painting of Osama bin Laden hangs above the fireplace, where the American flag is being burned.
As you may have guessed, the Obama camp is not amused. Here is Bill Burton from the Obama campaign in the same ABC News article:
“The New Yorker may think, as one of their staff explained to us, that their cover is a satirical lampoon of the caricature Senator Obama’s right-wing critics have tried to create. But most readers will see it as tasteless and offensive. And we agree.”"
UPDATE: The artist, Barry Blitt, is already defending the illustration at The Huffington Post:
I think the idea that the Obamas are branded as unpatriotic [let alone as terrorists] in certain sectors is preposterous. It seemed to me that depicting the concept would show it as the fear-mongering ridiculousness that it is.
Sorry Barry, not buying it. This will only give aid and comfort to “certain sectors” – and adorn their walls.
free viagra
buy viagra online
generic viagra
how does viagra work
cheap viagra
buy viagra
buy viagra online inurl
viagra 6 free samples
viagra online
viagra for women
viagra side effects
female viagra
natural viagra
online viagra
cheapest viagra prices
herbal viagra
alternative to viagra
buy generic viagra
purchase viagra online
free viagra without prescription
viagra attorneys
free viagra samples before buying
buy generic viagra cheap
viagra uk
generic viagra online
try viagra for free
generic viagra from india
fda approves viagra
free viagra sample
what is better viagra or levitra
discount generic viagra online
viagra cialis levitra
viagra dosage
viagra cheap
viagra on line
best price for viagra
free sample pack of viagra
viagra generic
viagra without prescription
discount viagra
gay viagra
mail order viagra
viagra inurl
generic viagra online paypal
generic viagra overnight
generic viagra online pharmacy
generic viagra uk
buy cheap viagra online uk
suppliers of viagra
how long does viagra last
viagra sex
generic viagra soft tabs
generic viagra 100mg
buy viagra onli
generic viagra online without prescription
viagra energy drink
cheapest uk supplier viagra
viagra cialis
generic viagra safe
viagra professional
viagra sales
viagra free trial pack
viagra lawyers
over the counter viagra
best price for generic viagra
viagra jokes
buying viagra
viagra samples
viagra sample
cialis
generic cialis
cheapest cialis
buy cialis online
buying generic cialis
cialis for order
what are the side effects of cialis
buy generic cialis
what is the generic name for cialis
cheap cialis
cialis online
buy cialis
cialis side effects
how long does cialis last
cialis forum
cialis lawyer ohio
cialis attorneys
cialis attorney columbus
cialis injury lawyer ohio
cialis injury attorney ohio
cialis injury lawyer columbus
prices cialis
cialis lawyers
viagra cialis levitra
cialis lawyer columbus
online generic cialis
daily cialis
cialis injury attorney columbus
cialis attorney ohio
cialis cost
cialis professional
cialis super active
how does cialis work
what does cialis look like
cialis drug
viagra cialis
cialis to buy new zealand
cialis without prescription
free cialis
cialis soft tabs
discount cialis
cialis generic
generic cialis from india
cheap cialis sale online
cialis daily
cialis reviews
cialis generico
how can i take cialis
cheap cialis si
cialis vs viagra
levitra
generic levitra
levitra attorneys
what is better viagra or levitra
viagra cialis levitra
levitra side effects
buy levitra
levitra online
levitra dangers
how does levitra work
levitra lawyers
what is the difference between levitra and viagra
levitra versus viagra
which works better viagra or levitra
buy levitra and overnight shipping
levitra vs viagra
canidan pharmacies levitra
how long does levitra last
viagra cialis levitra
levitra acheter
comprare levitra
levitra ohne rezept
levitra 20mg
levitra senza ricetta
cheapest generic levitra
levitra compra
cheap levitra
levitra overnight
levitra generika
levitra kaufen

12 Comments, Comment or Ping
rikyrah
With ‘friends’ like this…Obama needs no enemies.
Jul 13th, 2008
Anovelista
Exactly. Sheesh!
Jul 13th, 2008
Lynne
If you look at some of Barry Britt’s past illustrations, its impossible for him to seriously defend this particular cover as simply “satire”. Just look at his past work and you see the very different concepts….with the Obamas he portrayed the ugliest racial/ethnic stereotypes he could conjure up as his basis for parodying the idiotic imagery that’s been created in the minds of many. His other covers aren’t even close to being so…so….i can’t think of the word to even use. His “satire” will be lost on many because its not coming across as simply silly…its coming across as just downright hateful. This won’t make those who think the Obamas are secret radical Christian muslim extremists, reassess their thoughts and realize “oh how stupid I’ve been!”…nope, on the contrary, this will just embolden them.
Jul 13th, 2008
Anovelista
I hear you Lynne. A commenter on Rikyrah’s post at Jack & Jill Politics made another good point:
I was immediately hit with the image of thousands of newstands in airports, on street corners, at Barnes and Nobles with this image multiplied into the millions. It doesn’t matter if they say it is satire, that is not what the reality of it is in that setting.
The “satire” will not be apparent to the thousands of people who will pass those newsstands in airports and street corners across the country.
Jul 13th, 2008
Lynne
That’s so true…..but you know what? Barry Blitt is not naive….the purpose of this cover in its overt derogatory imagery, is not about satire..its about inciting an emotion at the first side glance (you don’t even have to look at it directly to either get extremely mad or extremely giddy). Blitt is no fool, this is no different from Annie Liebowitz of Vogue pretending that a “photo is just a photo” when you KNOW its ALWAYS more than that. Now, for the next week, this topic will be on every single morning and evening talk news show. Expect Blitt to sit with Meredith on the Today Show, Diane on Good Morning America – and there will be the roundtable on every show from O’Lielly to Olbermann to Larry King…just watch….there were many meetings at The New Yorker this past month in anticipation of all this – from marketing to legal..these people ain’t fooling nobody.
Jul 13th, 2008
Narcissa
Wow, I had no idea Hillary Clinton was such a proficient sketch artist!
Jul 13th, 2008
C Jeff
So, you don’t have a subscription to the The New Yorker but would cancel if you could? Do it anyway. Send a cancellation request to NYRcustserv@cdsfulfillment.com because cancellation requests speak louder than condemnation alone. Let them figure out if you have a subscription or not. Tell them why you are canceling.
Jul 13th, 2008
george
What’s the difference between this and a cartoon depicting a stereotyped Jewish person sitting atop a bunch of money bags?
Satire? I don’t buy it.
Jul 14th, 2008
Bill
My “lawyer” pants tells me that Michelle will have a SUPER legal case against the New Yorker, once this edition hits the streets. Barack on the other hand is a public figure deeply involved in politics as a career and
can be subject to so-called “cartoon satire”. Michelle is a private citizen who has an unlimited wideopen steller professional life ahead of her in the years to come, regardless if her husband’s campaign is successful or not.
I think she should put together a legal team to take on the New Yorker. Nothing chills the overheated public viewpoint that a well known person like Michelle is fair game for public ridicule (or “satire”) like the propspect of losing millions in a high profile personal injury slander suit.
IMHO the New Yorker has thrown down the gauntlet in this long simmering background controversey, i.e., exercising media restraint due to the strong racial pressures in this presidential campaign. They have blasted all racist arguments out front and center onto the American media stage. Barry Blitt like the guy who lights up a cigarette inside the shed where boxes of dynamite are stored. If Michelle doesn’t punish the publishers of the New Yorker, she could look forward to being depicted in the handiwork of hundreds of Barry Blitt wannabees.
I seem to remember years ago Madam Josophine Baker also had a seriious legal fight over how she was “satirized” in an issue of the New Yorker magazine. I think it was about the time of the famous “Stork Club” incident where even as a world famous celebrated entertainer Ms. Baker was denied entrance into the club as a patron. So racist “satire” is nothing new at the New Yorker….
Jul 14th, 2008
I'm Voting Obama 2008
The New Yorker is still Upset Hillary lost, this is a disgrace, offensive and disgusting cover, may they all burn in hell because of this…..
Jul 14th, 2008
mike smith
if this does not constitute slander what does
Jul 14th, 2008
slapper58
I understand that there’s a lot at stake in this upcoming election but to ascribe nefarious motives to Barry Blitt for what is clearly a satirical sketch is missing the point. When Obama became a serious contender for the presidency it was easy to foresee racism eventually rearing its ugly head but who could have figured on the insidious and ridiculous series of incidents: the lapel pin, the misquotes (whitey??, ashamed to be American??etc.), the photo of Barack in Muslim-ish garb, his name lovingly inflected by so many talk radio hosts; Barack HUSSEIN Obama, a “terrorist” fist bump. This crap has been going on for months now but this drawing has succeeded in raising the ire that those other examples failed to do.
This is satire and it speaks to a truth that is the baseless insinuations raised by those opposed to Obama. It’s so much easier to focus on this meaningless surface stuff than the real issues as though this drawing will change peoples minds when push comes to shove.
All the racist assertions Blitt has depicted are already out there, even in mainstream media pulpits, and the cover merely groups them together as if to shine a bright light on the lunacy that too often goes unnoticed.
I’m sure Obama gets this as do those responsible for the website he set up to fight such underhanded attacks.
Blitt was defending the Obamas and mature political discourse. Everybody should ease up on the vitriol and start focusing on the important matters that concern us all.
Jul 14th, 2008