And here’s a message to all of the haters out there:

I take it that most of you people never attend formal events. If you did, you would know that at least 50% of evening attire includes a mix of strapless and sleeveless gowns even in READY TO WEAR. The reason being that most desigeners leave the choice up to the buyer to make the selection that best shows of her assets.

It’s my opinion that people who are complaining about Michelle’s bare arms are most likely the same ones who need to cover their own arms. I suggest hitting the heavy bag, lifting some weights and push away from the dessert trays and ice cream cones instead of constantly nitpicking over someone else’s toned physique. I also find it a tad bit odd that frequently Jackie O is used as standard bearer when Mrs. Kennedy’s use of strapless evening gowns was considered quit scandalous especially since she was the FIRST first lady who wore strapless gowns but also dared to wear a black evening gown with a plunging neckline and bare back.

I guess this is what to be expected from people who sport muffin top complete with droopy, flaggy triceps. Of course you’d rather see a woman with her upper body covered more than likely you run to the nearest store seeking out turtlenecks and scarfs as you wolf down all you can eat pizza at the food court. Michelle O on the other hand works out and watches what she eats. Since she is the first lady perhaps you need to follow her lead and do what needs to be done and finally take a stroll over to the gym. Once you tone your own body I’m sure you too would feel far more comfortable at being able to free yourself to make almost any fashion choice without restriction.

I LOVE THE HATERS AND THE FACT THAT LADY MICHELLE GETS UNDER WEAK PEOPLE’S SKIN!!!!!

The dress was designed by a young man whose family has designed for Indian Royalty for THREE generations so I’m pretty sure he knew what would and what wouldn’t offend the Indian PM and he wouldn’t create a one of a kind dress for the First Lady that offended…..at least not if he wanted to work again!

Doesn’t the First lady feel uncomfortable (feel a little naked) as compare to all the other women who were more covered!

Nice dress but it could have been fixed somehow as to not look so naked. Or she could have worn the scarf around her shoulders.

I don’t think is proper. —Is this going to be the next new thing that all girls start wearing more strapless dresses?

They could have at least attached some leaves, some gloves,
I am sure the Indian president must have felt uncomfortable to look at her : look at face or at chest? I think even the french fist lady would have had more modesty in such an occasion.

BTW…Did you guys hear about the offensive google image of FLOTUS removed.

Here’s the story”

Michelle Obama Pictures UPDATE: Offensive Image REMOVED, Google ‘SORRY’ (PHOTO)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/24/michelle-obama-photo-goog_n_368760.html

UPDATE: The offensive Michell Obama picture has reportedly been removed from the website, Hot Girls, that posted the image.

The Hot Girls blog posted a short explanation in Chinese, along with a loosely translated apology in English, explaining, “I am very sorry for this article, and that this is the program automatically issued a document from the article. Do not the subject of race and politics make the discussion too radical and sincere hope that the world is very peaceful.” The Guardian also reported that the site took down the offensive image of Michelle Obama.

Google has purchased online ads in an effort to explain to users why an offensive image of Michelle Obama is appearing, and is ranked so highly, in its Google Image search results.